Thursday, January 28, 2021
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Climate Change News
  • Home
  • Weather
  • Climate Change
  • Global Warming
  • Discussion
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change News
  • Home
  • Weather
  • Climate Change
  • Global Warming
  • Discussion
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change News
No Result
View All Result
Home Weather

Beyond Petroleum Part Deux: “BP sees ‘peak oil’ in 2020s”

September 16, 2020
in Weather
8 min read
Beyond Petroleum Part Deux: “BP sees ‘peak oil’ in 2020s”
585
SHARES
3.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

You might also like

Angry Birds Survey Proves the World Demands Climate Action – Watts Up With That?

Bright Green Impossibilities – Watts Up With That?

Energy Prices to Rise Under Biden – Watts Up With That?

Guest “Looney Toons” by David Middleton

OPEC cuts oil demand forecasts, BP sees ‘peak oil’ in 2020s
September 14, 2020

LONDON (AP) — Developing countries’ difficulty in containing the spread of the coronavirus pandemic will keep a lid on global oil demand, particularly in India, the OPEC cartel said Monday as it cut its forecasts.

OPEC cut its estimates for world demand by 400,000 barrels a day for both this year and next. It now sees a drop in demand of 9.5 million barrels a day in 2020 and a rise of 6.6 million barrels in 2021.

“Risks remain elevated and skewed to the downside, particularly in relation to the development of COVID-19 infection cases and potential vaccines,” the cartel said in a monthly report on the industry.

[…]

BP says it expects demand for crude oil to peak in the early 2020s. If governments become more aggressive about reducing carbon emissions, demand might never recover from the current slump, its said in a report on the industry’s outlook.

AP

BP’s full report and supporting materials can be downloaded here:

Energy Outlook downloads and archive

I just love lame-stream media headlines…

“BP sees ‘peak oil’ in 2020s”… IF…

BP actually sees peak oil demand in 2019…

Figure 1. Business-as-usual >100 million bbl/d into the 2030’s.

But, only under their economic suicide scenarios:

Rapid… more like rabid…

Rapid assumes the introduction of policy measures, led by a significant increase in carbon ‎prices, that result in carbon emissions from energy use falling by around 70% by 2050 from ‎‎2018 levels. Rapid is broadly in line with scenarios that are consistent with limiting the rise in ‎global temperatures by 2100 to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels.‎

bp Energy Outlook ‎2020

Net zero… more like AOC-stupid

Net Zero assumes the policy measures of Rapid are reinforced by significant shifts in societal ‎and consumer behaviour and preferences – such as greater adoption of circular and sharing ‎economies and switching to low carbon energy sources. This increases the reduction in ‎carbon emissions by 2050 to over 95%. Net Zero is broadly in line with a range of scenarios ‎consistent with limiting temperature rises to 1.5°C. ‎

bp Energy Outlook ‎2020

Can you say “freeze in the dark”?

Both the Rapid and Net Zero scenarios assume a significant increase in carbon prices, ‎reaching $250/tonne of CO2 in the developed world by 2050 and $175/tonne in emerging ‎economies. This is much lower in the BAU scenario, with carbon prices reaching only $65 and ‎‎$35/tonne CO2 by 2050 on average in developed and emerging economies respectively.  ‎

bp Energy Outlook ‎2020

Bear in mind that a couple of years ago, the IPCC demanded YUGE carbon taxes to stay below the dreaded 1.5°C limit.

IPCC SR1.5 Carbon Tax Math

David Middleton / October 11, 2018

Guest seriousness by David Middleton

Over the past few days, I’ve posted a couple of articles by Michael Bastasch of the Daily Caller on the IPCC’s demands for a $240/gal tax on gasoline and $122 trillion to fight the Global War on Weather. Many commentators questioned the math behind the $240/gal gasoline tax. So, I thought I would put together a post showing the math.

[…]

WUWT

The price tag was so high, that the highly respected environmental economist, Richard Tol, described it as “not feasible.“

BP’s Looney Toons carbon taxes aren’t quite that staggering…

 Tax ($/tonne of CO2)  $        35 $          65 $        175 $        250
 Gasoline ($/gal)  $    0.31 $      0.58 $      1.54 $      2.20
 Natural Gas ($/mcf)  $    1.86 $      3.45 $      9.30 $    13.30
 Coal ($/short ton)  $  73.53 $  136.55 $  367.63 $  525.18
Carbon tax effect on various energy sources.

Unless you are a consumer. Here are the taxes as a percentage of recent retail gasoline, residential natural gas and bituminous coal prices:

 Tax ($/tonne of CO2)  $        35 $          65 $        175 $        250
 Gasoline ($2.18/gal) 14%26%71%101%
 Natural Gas ($15.37/mcf)12%22%61%87%
 Coal ($59.43 /short ton)124%230%619%884%
Carbon tax as percentage of recent energy prices.

But, why on Earth would an oil company be calling for such taxes on consumers?

Figure 2. Looney Toons!

Our new purpose and ambition are underpinned by four fundamental
judgements about the future. That the world is on an unsustainable path and its carbon budget is running out.

[…]

In August, we set out a new strategy in support of this purpose and
ambition. It will see bp transform from an International Oil Company focused on producing resources to an Integrated Energy Company focused on delivering solutions for customers.

Bernard C. Looney, BP CEO

Where have we heard this sort of psychobabble before?

‘Beyond Petroleum’ No More? BP Goes Back to Basics
Javier E. David | @TeflonGeek
Published 12:39 PM ET Mon, 22 April 2013 Updated 1:20 AM ET Tue, 23 April 2013

After a very public campaign to promote renewable energy, BP is inaugurating Earth Day as a markedly less “green” company — highlighting how certain business realities have run headlong into the once lofty expectations surrounding alternative energy.

In early April, Europe’s second-largest energy company quietly announced that it was divesting of its wind power assets, part of what the company referred to as BP’s “continuing effort to become a more focused oil and gas company and re-position the company for sustainable growth into the future.” The decision followed BP’s 2011 exit from solar power after 40 years in the business.

[…]

CNBC

I guess it’s back to “Beyond Petroleum”

How do you get back there from here? Robotaxis! Despite taxing the living schist out of us, they expect that increasing prosperity will lead to an explosion of electric robotaxis…

Figure 3. Electric robotaxis… Yeah, that’s the ticket!

Even in the business-as-usual scenario, imaginary electric robotaxis will account 50% of the passenger vehicle-kilometres (VKM) driven by mid-century.

Figure 4. I’m still waiting for the flying cars we were supposed to get in the 21st Century… Might as well be flying unicorns.

Electric robotaxis…

What do oil companies produce apart from oil?

Natural gas, baby! Despite the imposition of massive taxes on natural gas consumption, demand will continue to rise in two of the three scenarios.

Figure 5. Natural gas is a gas!

Under the business-as-usual scenario, the civilized world will be paying a natural gas carbon tax of $3.45/mcf in 2050 and consuming 25% of it. The current wellhead price (Henry Hub) is only $2.32/mcf. Under the “net zero” scenario, unbridled prosperity will have delivered fleets of electric robotaxis, while we are paying a carbon tax of $13.30/mcf and still consuming as much natural gas as we were in 2000.

In fairness to the folks at Beyond Petroleum, several times they state that these scenarios aren’t forecasts…

Spencer Dale said: “The role of the Energy Outlook is not to predict or forecast how the ‎energy system is likely to change over time. We can’t predict the future; all the scenarios ‎discussed in this year’s Outlook will be wrong. Rather, the Outlook uses these different ‎scenarios to help better understand the range of uncertainty we face as the energy system ‎transitions to a lower carbon world. Improving our understanding of this uncertainty is an ‎important input into designing a strategy that is robust and resilient to the range of outcomes ‎we may face.”‎

bp Energy Outlook ‎2020

However, the lame-stream media don’t seem to have noticed…

BP’s Forecasts Peak Oil Demand

BP warns of oil demand peak by early 2020s

BP projects peak oil demand is very close or already happened

The Man Who Predicted the Future for BP Says Peak Oil Is Nigh

Oops! Strike the last one… It’s from 2013.

izquotes.com

The Man Who Predicted the Future for BP Says Peak Oil Is Nigh
An ex-BP geologist says that we’ve hit peak oil, and that it will “break economies.”

By Brian Merchant

In a year that saw the United States reach near-historic levels of fossil fuel production, it seemed that the words ‘peak oil’ were scarcely uttered. But it’s still a looming question, that we have yet to satisfactorily answer—when are we going to run out of oil? Have we already started to? A renowned geologist, and a former top analyst for BP no less, says the answer is yes.

“We are probably in peak oil today, or at least in the foot-hills,” Dr. Richard Miller said recently at a talk in London. According to the Guardian, Miller “prepared BP’s in-house projections of future oil supply for BP from 2000 to 2007,” and is bringing peak oil back into focus at the end of a petroleum-soaked year. He says that oil production has already peaked in 37 oil-producing countries, and that global production is declining at about 3.5 million barrels every year. Continued reliance on oil, and the coming shortage, will do nothing less than “break economies.”

[…]

Motherboard, December 24, 2013

It’s amazing that Peak Oil 2013 still entailed economies jumping off off a Seneca Cliff into Olduvai Gorge.  While Peak Oil 2020 will be delivered by electric robotaxis! You really couldn’t make this sort of schist up if you tried.

Summary

BP’s annual statistical reviews of world energy are invaluable references. Beyond Petroleum Part Deux is 100%…

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

Credit: Source link

Share234Tweet146
Previous Post

Global warming is pushing the Arctic into a new climate

Next Post

Gov. Phil Scott vetoes Global Warming Solutions Act, sets stage for possible override attempt | News

Related Posts

Angry Birds Survey Proves the World Demands Climate Action – Watts Up With That?
Weather

Angry Birds Survey Proves the World Demands Climate Action – Watts Up With That?

January 28, 2021
Does China Pose a Threat to Global Rare Earth Supply Chains? – Watts Up With That?
Weather

Bright Green Impossibilities – Watts Up With That?

January 28, 2021
Energy Prices to Rise Under Biden – Watts Up With That?
Weather

Energy Prices to Rise Under Biden – Watts Up With That?

January 28, 2021
Endangered Cloud Forests, Clouds and Climate Change – Watts Up With That?
Weather

Endangered Cloud Forests, Clouds and Climate Change – Watts Up With That?

January 28, 2021
Load More
Next Post
Gov. Phil Scott vetoes Global Warming Solutions Act, sets stage for possible override attempt | News

Gov. Phil Scott vetoes Global Warming Solutions Act, sets stage for possible override attempt | News

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Football clubs’ 14-minute flights and a global warming problem nobody will tackle – The Athletic

Football clubs’ 14-minute flights and a global warming problem nobody will tackle – The Athletic

January 21, 2020
Outside/In Presents The Refuge | Episode 4: Path Dependence

Outside/In Presents The Refuge | Episode 4: Path Dependence

August 29, 2020

Don't miss it

Global warming climate crisis: Lapland town Salla launches Olympic ‘bid’ for 2032 | News
Global Warming

Global warming climate crisis: Lapland town Salla launches Olympic ‘bid’ for 2032 | News

January 28, 2021
Worse to come than Covid if global warming and damage to ecosystems continue, Bath expert warns
Global Warming

Worse to come than Covid if global warming and damage to ecosystems continue, Bath expert warns

January 22, 2021
New outlook for spring: warmer, drier than normal
Global Warming

New outlook for spring: warmer, drier than normal

January 26, 2021
Biden’s Regressive Energy Policy Is A Nasty War On The Poor
Climate Change

Biden’s Regressive Energy Policy Is A Nasty War On The Poor

January 26, 2021
NASA: Global warming could mean more extreme droughts, increased forest fires in Arizona
Global Warming

NASA: Global warming could mean more extreme droughts, increased forest fires in Arizona

January 23, 2021
Weaknesses of solar and wind, Myths and Questions that require an answer
Weather

Mark Steyn files an eviscerating Motion for Summary Judgement in the Michael Mann libel suit – Watts Up With That?

January 25, 2021
Climate Change News

ClimateChange.Live is an online news portal which aims to share Daily Climate News Updates, Global Warming and Weather News. Feel free to get in touch with us!

Whats New Here

  • Due to Global Warming, Earth Lost 28 Trillion Tonnes Of Ice From 1994 To 2017
  • Science denialism in the new administration
  • Angry Birds Survey Proves the World Demands Climate Action – Watts Up With That?

Subscribe NOW

© 2019 ClimateChange.Live - All rights reserved!

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Weather
  • Climate Change
  • Global Warming
  • Discussion

© 2019 ClimateChange.Live - All rights reserved!

Feel free to subscribe now!